专注澳门亚美,澳门亚美官方平台行业13年
源自英伦皇室呵护
澳门亚美,澳门亚美官方平台特许经营备案
备案号:0320100111700070

首页 > 新闻资讯 > 新店公告


【澳门亚美官方平台】恒大FC“开除”于汉超,足协会跟进处罚吗?



发布日期:2021-04-07 13:41:01 发布者:Admin5  点击率:

Evergrande FC "fired" Yu Hanchao, will the Football Association follow up with punishment?

恒大足球俱乐部“解雇”于汉超,足协会跟进吗?

Lu Wei

l u Wei

Editor's note:

编者注:

This article is only a personal academic research. The information obtained in the article comes from news reports. The views of the article are only personal immature understandings, and there are irregularities. I hope readers Haihan. Readers are welcome to reprint, but please indicate the source when reprinting to avoid unnecessary legal responsibility.

本文仅是个人学术研究。本文中获得的信息来自新闻报道。本文的观点仅是个人未成熟的理解,并且存在不合规定之处。希望读者海涵。欢迎读者转载,但转载时请注明出处,以避免不必要的法律责任。

Evergrande FC’s announcement on the dismissal of Hanchao’s off-site behavior of altering license plates is not a legal concept. In the labor contract law and labor law, the employer can terminate, change, and terminate the labor relationship with the employee, and it does not exist. The concept of expulsion. Therefore, expulsion is only a concept in the team discipline and rules of the Evergrande FC team. As a part of the company, the main body of the team is the company. There is no doubt that the company’s "expulsion" is unreasonable. From a legal perspective, it is between the company and the workers (players). It should only be to terminate or terminate the labor relationship, not to expel.

恒大足球俱乐部宣布解散汉超在车外更改车牌的行为不是法律概念。在劳动合同法和劳动法中,用人单位可以终止,变更和终止与雇员的劳动关系,但这种劳动关系不存在。驱逐的概念。因此,开除只是恒大足球俱乐部团澳门亚美官方平台队纪律和规则中的一个概念。作为公司的一部分,团队的主体是公司。毫无疑问,公司的“开除”是不合理的。从法律的角度来看,它是在公司和工人(玩家)之间。它只能是终止或终止劳动关系,而不是开除。

Evergrande FC did not use the legal concept of dissolving labor relations, which may have its deep meaning. In addition to the status of a player, the player’s intangible asset value is that the club has to consider the actual cost issue. After all, it was expensive to transfer Yu Hanchao to Evergrande FC. According to Yu Hanchao's current competitive level and physical condition, it is believed that the transfer of Hanchao to any Chinese Super League club can get a certain financial return.

恒大足球俱乐部没有使用解散劳资关系的法律概念,这可能具有深远的意义。除了球员的身分之外,球员的无形资产价值还在于俱乐部必须考虑实际的成本问题。毕竟,将于汉超转移到恒大足球俱乐部的代价很高。根据于汉超目前的竞技水平和身体状况,可以认为汉超转会给任何中超俱乐部都可以获得一定的经济回报。

Now Evergrande FC has to terminate the labor relationship with the players due to the illegal behavior of the players off the court, which is unrealistic from an economic perspective. Because for players, Evergrande’s termination of the labor relationship with them will instead allow them to become free agents and quickly find another club to sign. Of course, if Evergrande and the player’s labor contract stipulate serious violations of rules and discipline, the club can terminate the contract. When the labor relationship with the player is terminated and the reputation and economic loss caused by the player to the club can be investigated, Evergrande FC can request the Chinese Football Association Arbitration Committee that Yu Hanchao bear the economic loss, and the player may not be so calm.

现在,由于球员在场外的非法行为,恒大足球俱乐部必须终止与球员的劳资关系,从经济角度来看这是不现实的。因为对于球员来说,恒大终止与他们的劳资关系将使他们成为自由澳门亚美官方平台球员,并迅速找到另一家具乐部签约。当然,如果恒大和球员的劳动合同规定严重违反规则和纪律,俱乐部可以终止合同。当与球员的劳资关系终止并可以调查球员对俱乐部造成的声誉和经济损失时,恒大足球俱乐部可以要求中国足球协会仲裁委员会于汉超承担经济损失,而球员可能不会好冷静

Evergrande FC did not use the legal concept of dismissal of the labor relationship, but used the concept of expulsion and discipline. It may be a public relations behavior that leaves room for public relations. After public opinion subsides, Yu Hanchao can return smoothly after he has changed his mind. For its follow-up behavior, let us wait and see.

恒大足球俱乐部没有使用解雇劳资关系的法律概念,而是使用了开除和纪律的概念。这可能是一种公共关系行为,为公共关系留出了空间。舆论平息后,于汉超改变主意后可以顺利返回。对于其后续行为,让我们拭目以待。

So, can the Chinese Football Association follow up and punish Yu Hanchao after he was detained for his license plate alteration? Judging from the fact that Zhang Xiuwei was punished by the Chinese Football Association Disciplinary Committee for falsifying the participation certificate with a false age, and Zhang Lu was punished by the Chinese Football Association for the following penalties in accordance with the "Detailed Rules for the Implementation of Regulations on the Management of National Football Teams at All Levels", we predict this , This time, if the Chinese Football Association wants to punish Yu Hanchao, which subject will be punished according to which penalty provisions.

那么,中国足球协会能不能跟进于汉超因车牌变更而被拘留后对其进行处罚?根据张秀伟因伪造年龄虚假参加证而受到中国足协纪律处分的处罚,根据中国足球协会纪律处分的《实施细则》,张露因以下处罚受到处罚: 《国家足球队各级管理条例》,我们对此进行了预测,这一次,如果中国足球协会要处罚于汉超,将根据哪项处罚规定处罚该对象。

First of all, let’s take a look at the difference in punishments between Zhang Xiuwei’s case and Zhang Lu’s case. Although both were drunken acts off the court, the basis and subject of the punishment were different. The subject of punishment in Zhang Xiuwei’s case was the Disciplinary Committee of the Chinese Football Association. The regulations are the penalties for fraud in Article 71; the main punishment for Zhang Lu's case is the Chinese Football Association and the Chinese National Men's Football Team, and the punishment is the "Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Regulations for the Administration of Players of National Football Teams at All Levels", and the specific regulations are unclear. Why do the same violations occur, and there are problems of different punishment subjects and punishment basis? The reason is that the "Chinese Football Association Disciplinary Punishment Guidelines" did not include players' off-court behavior in the scope of the regulation, and failed to categorize such off-court behaviors. However, the Chinese Football Association cannot face public opinion. Not responding and expressing, therefore, the Chinese Football Association must find a reason for punishment, so the Chinese Football Association can break through the Chinese Football Association Disciplinary Committee, the only legal punishment subject, jump out of the rules, and punish Zhang Lu through changes in the punishment subject and another basis for punishment. The act of drunk driving, in the end, the Chinese Football Association properly quelled the pursuit of public opinion.

首先,让我们看一下张秀伟案和张露案的刑罚区别。尽管两者都是场外醉酒行为,但处罚的依据和对象是不同的。张秀伟案的处罚对象是中国足协纪律委员会。该规定是第71条中欺诈行为的惩罚;张璐案的主要处罚是中国足球协会和中国国家男子足球队,而处罚是《实施各级国家足球队运动员管理条例的详细规定》,具体规定尚不清楚。为什么会发生同样的违规行为,并且存在不同的处罚主体和处罚依据的问题?原因是《中国足球协会纪律处分指南》没有将球员的场外行为纳入法规范围,并且没有对此类场外行为进行分类。但是,中国足协无法面对舆论。因此,中国足协没有回应和表示,必须找到处罚的理由,这样中国足协才能突破中国足协纪律委员会这一唯一的法律处罚对象,跳出规章制度,并通过惩罚主体的变化和惩罚的另一个依据。酒后驾车的行为最终使中国足协平息了对舆论的追求。

However, this time Yu Hanchao's act of altering the license plate once again touched the nerves of public opinion and pushed the Chinese Football Association to the top of the wave. How did the Chinese Football Association punish Yu Han Chaonan? There is no basis for disciplinary punishment. According to the principle of non-punishment stipulated in the law, it is obviously impossible to find a "crime" to be punished. Can the "Detailed Implementation Rules for the Management of National Football Team Players at All Levels" be used for punishment? Obviously, it is also not possible, because Yu Hanchao is not an active national, and this rule cannot be applied to Hanchao. The first two times were unworkable, so how to punish is really embarrassing.

然而,这次余汉超的换车牌行为再次触动了舆论的神经,将中国足协推上了风口浪尖。中国足协如何处罚韩超男?没有纪律处分依据。根据法律规定的非惩罚原则,显然不可能找到要受到惩罚的“罪行”。可以使用“各级国家足球队队员管理的详细实施细则”进行处罚吗?显然,这也是不可能的,因为于汉超不是一个活跃的国民,并且该规则不能应用于汉超。前两次是行不通的,因此如何惩罚实在令人尴尬。

Let’s analyze Yu Hanchao’s behavior. Former internationals, Evergrande players, luxury cars, painted license plates, public opinion complaints about their moral quality, then, can the Football Association follow the "Chinese Football Association Ethics and Fair Play Committee Working Guidelines (Trial Implementation) )) "Article 25, paragraph 16, other violations of ethics and fair play shall be interpreted and punished. After all, Article 3 stipulates that the "violation" referred to in this working rule is harmful to the integrity and reputation of football and is Unrelated or rarely related activities that violate ethics and fair competition. If appropriate expansion of the interpretation can solve the problem of the basis of punishment, but from a legal point of view, does this form an expanded interpretation that will damage the rights of players. According to the essence of the modern rule of law, there is no explicit stipulation that the law does not impose penalties. This has become the most basic principle of human rights protection. No matter how serious a player’s illegal behavior is, it cannot be punished without a legal basis. Although the Chinese Football Association is a social team, it should follow This principle is to punish players. If there is no basis for punishment, they cannot be punished. This is the price of fragmentation and lag in the rules. What the Chinese Football Association can do is to amend the disciplinary guidelines or ethical guidelines as soon as possible to fill in the lack of legislation. But not under the pressure of public opinion to find "regulations" or make expansionary explanations to punish players.

让我们来分析俞汉超的行为。前国际球员,恒大球员,豪华车,涂漆的车牌,有关其道德素质的舆论抱怨,那么,足协可以遵循《中国足协道德与公平竞赛委员会工作指南(试行))》第25条,第16条应解释和惩罚其他违反道德和公平竞争的行为。毕竟,第3条规定,本工作规则中提及的“违规行为”对足球的完整性和声誉有害,并且是与道德和公平竞争相违背的无关紧要的活动。如果适当扩展解释范围可以解决惩罚依据的问题,但是从法律的角度来看,这是否构成了扩展解释范围,从而损害了玩家的权利。根据现代法治的本质,没有明确规定法律不施加处罚。这已成为保护人权的最基本原则。不管球员的违法行为有多严重,没有法律依据都不能受到惩罚。尽管中国足协是一个社会团体,但应遵循这一原则惩罚运动员。如果没有惩罚依据,就不会受到惩罚。这是零碎和规则滞后的代价。中国足协可以做的就是尽快修改纪律准则或道德准则,以弥补法律的不足。但这并不是在舆论的压力下寻找“规章”或做出扩张性的解释来惩罚玩家。

Finally, the public security department has already imposed fines and administrative detention for Yu Hanchao's alteration of license plates. The Chinese Football Association has imposed additional penalties. Does it violate the principle of no more penalties? From a legal point of view, an act should not be punished twice by the same penalty subject, but the subject of the penalty here is different. The fine and administrative detention are made by the public security organs. If the Chinese Football Association adds additional penalties, it is the industry. The internal association law of the Association, these are two types of penalties. The club’s expulsion of Yu Hanchao is based on the punishment of the team discipline and team rules. This is the basis for the punishment formed in the labor contract. Therefore, Yu Hanchao altered the license plate. Although the matter may be punished by the public security department, the Chinese Football Association, and the club, it does not violate the principle of no more punishment for one thing.

最后,公安部门已经对于汉超的车牌变更处以罚款和行政拘留。中国足协对此施加了额外的处罚。是否违反了不再处罚的原则?从法律的角度来看,一个行为不应受到同一刑罚对象的两次处罚,但是这里的刑罚对象是不同的。罚款和行政拘留由公安机关作出。如果中国足协加重处罚,那就是行业了。协会的内部协会法,这是两种处罚。俱乐部对俞汉超的开除是基于对球队纪律和球队规则的惩罚。这是在劳动合同中形成惩罚的基础。因此,于汉超改变了车牌。尽管此事可能会受到公安部门,中国足协和俱乐部的处罚,但这并不违反不再对一件事进行处罚的原则。

From the perspective of economic costs, if the Chinese Football Association really imposes additional penalties, the cost of Yu Hanchao’s alteration of the license plate is indeed higher. This illegal cost and penalty consequences are indeed heavier. However, as a former international player, Heng The big players, public figures, and young people’s role models, whether he should bear all this, set an example for the society and young people, and strictly restrict his behavior for the reputation of Chinese football. Of course, this is difficult to measure. Kundera There is a book called "The Unbearable Lightness of Life". At this moment, it may be more appropriate to describe the consequences of Yu Hanchao's alteration of license plates. I hope that the football world will not have the next "Zhang Hanchao, Ma Hanchao..."

从经济成本的角度来看,如果中国足协真的加重处罚,于汉超换车牌的成本确实更高。这种非法成本和罚款后果的确更加严重。但是,作为一名国际大亨,这位大人物,公众人物和年轻人的榜澳门亚美样,他是否应该承担所有这些,为社会和年轻人树立榜样,并严格限制他为中国足球声名的举止。当然,这很难衡量。昆德拉(Kundera)有一本书叫做“生命的无法承受的光明”。此刻,描述于汉超更改车牌的后果可能更合适。我希望足球世界不会有下一个“张汉超,马汉超……”

 
 
公司地址:江苏省南京市栖霞区八卦洲工业园276号
招商热线:025-85317723 / 025-85317724

咨询该项目有机会获得
考察项目
食宿三星级酒店
价值不菲
创业大礼包
创业全程
专业1对1指导

温馨提示:
请填写真实信息,我们会把有价值的经营管理理念传递给您 ,让您早日实现创业梦想!创业有风险,投资需谨慎。

在线申请

姓名
电话
类型
所在城市
留言
IP:
路径:
时间:

加盟热线:
025-85317723
025-85317724

澳门亚美|澳门亚美官方平台

总部地址:江苏省南京市栖霞区八卦洲澳门亚美工业园
服务热线:025-85317723 85317724

投资有风险,选择需谨慎

澳门亚美,澳门亚美官方平台版权所有    浙ICP备15015430号-1      网站地图